C|Net posted an article yesterday (Link) discussing efforts to create an open source framework for the sharing of hardware designs. For those of you interested, a draft proposal for what’s called the “TAPR Open Hardware License” is available for review (Link to PDF).
I’ve just read the current draft (version 0.9) and I confess to wondering if author John Ackerman has given sufficient thought to how this thing will be used/abused in the tangible world. I’ve not given this sufficient thought, but it seems to me that software receives significantly more protection than hardware from the simpler and less expensive Copyright system. I could be wrong, but if that’s the case, then basing an open source framework for hardware on a similar system used for software might not be appropriate; assuming that’s what they’re doing here (and based on the main player, Bruce Perens, I am making that assumption).
Continue reading