{"id":1335,"date":"2007-06-29T14:01:11","date_gmt":"2007-06-29T18:01:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.rebang.com\/?p=1335"},"modified":"2009-02-19T17:44:24","modified_gmt":"2009-02-19T21:44:24","slug":"coca-cola-20","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.rebang.com\/?p=1335","title":{"rendered":"Coca-Cola 2.0"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I just got off the phone with Coca-Cola&#8217;s David Vanderpoel. You might recall <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.rebang.com\/?p=1263#comment-4879\">his earlier comment<\/a> regarding the Coca-Cola VirtualThirst campaign in Second Life that came as a result of my critique of the competition rules.<\/p>\n<p>If you&#8217;ve not read my most recent post (<a href=\"http:\/\/blog.rebang.com\/?p=1333\">reLink<\/a>), here&#8217;s the back story:<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nOne of the VirtualThirst <strike>contestants<\/strike> participants had placed an item intended as part of the competition activities up for distribution on the <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.rebang.com\/?p=1263#comment-4879\">Second Life Exchange website<\/a>. Someone reportedly contacted SLExchange informing them of the trademark infringement of not just Coca-Cola&#8217;s brand but others as well (actually, multiple hits rings alarm bells in my mind).<\/p>\n<p>The contestant contacted C.C. Chapman of marketing firm <a href=\"http:\/\/www.crayonville.com\/\">crayon<\/a>, the group responsible for the competition, and Chapman immediately contacted the people at Coca-Cola&#8230; who then contacted SLExchange and requested they <em>not<\/em> police their trademark and that they reinstate the items which had been removed.<\/p>\n<p>Vanderpoel informed me during our conversation that Coca-Cola did <em>not<\/em>, at any time, contact SLExchange to <em>remove<\/em> items, which makes sense given that other brands were apparently included in that notification.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>After I&#8217;d read the secondhand report that Coca-Cola had &#8220;released&#8221; their trademark, I immediately got to thinking that a) there was <em>no<\/em> official guidance, and b) even I wouldn&#8217;t <em>unconditionally<\/em> release a trademark.<\/p>\n<p>So I contacted C.C. Chapman who put me through to Vanderpoel. And I&#8217;ve got one thing to say: I&#8217;m impressed.<\/p>\n<p>First off, my understanding from our conversation is that no one should expect any official guidance from Coca-Cola. Additionally, I was informed that Coca-Cola simply doesn&#8217;t want an intermediary policing their brand for them. Nor do they want to interfere with the in-world economy when people are using their brand in ways that do not adversely impact them.<\/p>\n<p>Okay. So that part makes good, reasonable sense to me. But there&#8217;s more.<\/p>\n<p>For those people who feel the need to use the Coca-Cola trade dress in ways that are detrimental to the brand&#8217;s reputation, Coca-Cola is more interested in establishing a dialog to help them understand why people want to attack them in the first place than they are in trying to stop them.<\/p>\n<p>This is by far the smartest position I&#8217;ve seen a company take lately.<\/p>\n<p>Now, that doesn&#8217;t mean I don&#8217;t think the competition could have been set up a little better, but the fact that they engaged the community, they adjusted (to some degree) after competition launch, and are now taking this extraordinary stance is, honestly, a welcome surprise to me. My hope now is that word will get out and other companies will follow their lead.<\/p>\n<p>So much for the theory that old brands can&#8217;t learn new tricks.<\/p>\n<p>{Minor Update: to make minor correction and improve clarity}<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I just got off the phone with Coca-Cola&#8217;s David Vanderpoel. You might recall his earlier comment regarding the Coca-Cola VirtualThirst campaign in Second Life that came as a result of my critique of the competition rules. If you&#8217;ve not read &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.rebang.com\/?p=1335\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1335","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-administrative"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.rebang.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1335","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.rebang.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.rebang.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.rebang.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.rebang.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1335"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.rebang.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1335\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.rebang.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1335"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.rebang.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1335"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.rebang.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1335"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}