
There are interesting articles in today’s New York Times – and two in particular that caught my attention. The first is an article by Alice Rawsthorn titled “But Is It Art?” (Link) which I think makes some worthwhile observations. In particular, these two comments registered with me:
The conception and process of producing art became as important as the work itself, which was increasingly made by someone else, not the artist.
…
Technology has also enabled designers to exercise greater control over the production of their work by using their computers to execute tasks once delegated to engineers or typesetters.
But then she gets into the kinds of distinctions that get me in trouble with fellow designers: Continue reading